An Olympic Dog’s Dinner

This summer, if you have a café in the UK and put a sign in your window advertising your special Olympic breakfast, a government backed jobs-worth will make you take it down, for infringing Olympic commercial rights.

However, if you’re an advertiser wanting to book a poster site within a javelin throw of an Olympic venue, that’s OK whether you’re an official sponsor or not, according to a barely remarked upon Brand Republic story last week, “LOCOG to open Olympic outdoor auction to non-sponsors.”

If I was a sponsor who’d been sold an exclusive opportunity I might think I’d been dealt a blow below-the-belt, particularly if I’d paid a premium rate, over an extended period of time, with a substantial down-payment. Although directly competitive brands have been barred from within the so called exclusion zones around Olympic venues, I’d still want to know under what terms these billboards are being knocked-out at now.

Outside of the exclusion zones outdoor advertising was always available to all brands after sponsors got first dibs, although most will have been made to pay for twelve-weeks of display, rather than the more usual fortnight.

Again if I was any of those brands whose media buyers had won them space in the auction rounds, I’d want to know that opportunistic advertisers with a bag-of-cash on the table right now can’t buy similar sites to those I’d secured, but for shorter periods, at a heavily discounted price.

It looks to me that if you wanted ads on buses or taxis, and some special locations, the auction did you well. Otherwise you may have paid platinum, for what have turned out to be, bronze, silver and gold.

If auctions are the future for buying and selling premium media space, I am a cat.

Although in fact I am Wobbly “the Cat” Clark, but that’s an old-story

You can read my other blogs and about what I do here: www.balloo.co.uk

  • Mike Baker

    Hopefully not at a heavily discounted price. Some points
    1. In the Option process, the prices were pegged back for sponsors based on 2010 prices to protect their interests.
    2. Many sponsors exercised their right not to buy anything in the Option process which left a sizeable hole.
    3. Government consultation on the London Games established that unsold panels (of which there were, and still are, thousands in the Game zones) would still be liable to pay their business rates and contractual obligations to owners like TfL
    4. The extended non-compete categories within vicinity boundaries
    represent no more than 5% of all advertising (no food, drink,
    toiletries, finance, retail, motors, household stores etc).
    5. Sponsors should not feel aggrieved if there are deals or shorter periods available, they can benefit from exactly the same opportunities now as any other authorised advertiser.
    6. All advertisers should be aware that there are still plenty of outdoor sites to go round during London 2012.
    7. As to whether auctions are the future, let’s see how Rio chooses to run it.

  • Maisie McCabe

    Thanks Mike – it’s very interesting to hear we’re talking about “thousands” of sites. Especially since the auction went so well.

  • William stickers

    ‘Sponsors should not feel aggrieved if there are deals or shorter periods available, they can benefit from exactly the same opportunities now as any other authorised advertiser’.

    Well they wouldn’t of been aggrieved at all if informed at the outset of the auction process that the organisers reserved the right to lower prices and offer shorter duration display periods ,even to non-sponsors, in the event of demand falling  someway short of supply.Which is clearly the case here.and some sponsors are aggrieved.or is it just another rumour that there’s some hefty re-negotiation going on.And might it not of been prudent for somebody-outdoor buyers ,auction organisers ,outdoor industry trade body etc-to of checked whether all those unique opportunities created by rapacious shopping mall owners and others to cash in on proximity to the games were actually legal in a planning sense.

    I agree with Wobbly Clark-auction dogs dinner.Read more: http://ivanclark.mediaweek.co.uk/2012/02/06/an-olympic-dog%e2%80%99s-dinner/#ixzz1lmp8t3ho

  • William stickers

    And hats off to Maisie McCabe for spotting the discrepancy..

Jobs

 
  • Most read

  • Most discussed/rated

  • Tags

  • Authors

  • Archives

    February 2012
    M T W T F S S
    « Jan   Mar »
     12345
    6789101112
    13141516171819
    20212223242526
    272829